Judge blasts town in cop ruling
Court orders officer's promotion; calls officials' actions arrogant

By Martin B. Cassidy
Staff Writer

September 7, 2007

In a searing decision that castigates the town for arrogance and flouting state employment law, a state Superior Court judge has ordered Greenwich to promote a police lieutenant to captain, ruling that another officer was illegally promoted to the post in 2003.

Superior Court Judge Michael Shay promoted police Lt. Gary Honulik, a 34-year veteran of the force, to captain, in his ruling Tuesday, finding that former Chief James Walters broke the town's long-running merit promotion process when it promoted Michael Pacewicz instead of Honulik, who was the top scorer on a June 2003 promotional exam for the post.

Shay also ordered that Pacewicz be removed as captain, because his 2003 promotion by Walters and other defendants, including First Selectman Jim Lash and former Human Resources Director Al Cava, was illegal, the decision said.

Shay said that both Honulik and Pacewicz have been harmed by the town's actions that violated civil service selection procedures, which limit discretion and establish "reasonable expectations for recognition and advancement."

"Sadly, this lesson was lost upon the Town of Greenwich and the individual defendants, Walters and Cava, as well as the First Selectman, James Lash, who, with arrogance and the misguided notion that their actions have all been for the good of the Town of Greenwich and the Greenwich Police Department, have created a situation where two dedicated, loyal and long serving public servants now find themselves on opposite sides of this litigation and many rank and file members of the Department find themselves at odds with higher authority," Shay wrote.

"Certainly this situation neither is what the people of Greenwich bargained for in the selection of their public officials, nor do they deserve, especially with regard to such a vital public service," he wrote.

Throughout his decision, Shay repeatedly rebuked the town and the police department, writing at one point that "Walter's testimony is simply not credible," and that the town "has not acted in good faith during the course of this litigation."

Honulik sued Walters, the town, and others in 2004, claiming Walters should have promoted him to captain because of the town's virtually unbroken practice of promoting the top scorer on police promotional exams.

After Honulik got the top score on the test, Walters added an oral interview to the process, and then promoted Pacewicz. Multiple witnesses testified that this went against all prior hiring practices, prompting Shay to write in his decision that the existence of the hiring process rules Honulik claimed were not followed echoed throughout the testimony and evidence "like the chorus in a Greek drama."

The result, Shay said, was an unfortunate situation for all parties concerned that left him with few options. Though the ruling rewards Honulik, it only does so by Pacewicz' pain. The judge blamed the town for putting the two men into that situation.

Shay wrote, "The town of Greenwich, through its agents and servants, has not only failed to resolve this matter equitably, but during the course of this litigation, it has also made the situation worse, with its thinly-disguised efforts to assure the results desired by Walters and Lash, regardless of the outcome of these legal proceedings É as a result, there is no easy way for the court to untie this legal 'Gordian Knot,' but to slice cleanly through it."

First Selectman Jim Lash said the town is weighing whether it will appeal the decision.

Lash declined further comment, and Pacewicz, Walters, and current Police Chief David Ridberg, who was not named in the suit, declined to comment.

Honulik said only, "I think the decision is self explanatory and stands on its own."

Though Shay rejected a claim that Walters' actions were malicious, he did find that Walters was biased toward Honulik and that this played a role in the promotion of Pacewicz.

At trial Walters and Honulik acknowledged previous disputes, including a 2002 argument after Walters denied Honulik permission to swap shifts. Honulik testified he told Walters he needed the swap to take his wife to the hospital, but Walters said he was not told about the family illness.

In response, Shay wrote, "Given Honulik's contemporaneous account of the incident, Walters' belated expression of support simply does not ring true."

Walters also maintained in his testimony that prior disagreements did not influence his choice of Pacewicz over Honulik.

Shay disagreed, writing, "His failure to promote Honulik was motivated by bias against Honulik and favoritism toward Pacewicz," and that witnesses' testimony "lend credence to the assertion that (Walters) harbored some ill will toward (Honulik)."

Town Attorney John Wayne Fox said the town did not agree with Shay's finding that Walters showed bias towards Honulik.

"In any litigation there are findings of fact and in this case there are findings that with all due respect we disagree with," Fox said. "In his testimony at trial the chief expressed a very strong opinion that there was no bias."

Honulik's attorney Kathryn Emmett said the decision was a vindication of Honulik's position that the town's policies required the top scoring candidate to be promoted.

Town officials acknowledged in their statements before the court that in the past decade, except for one case involving discipline problems, Honulik was the only top ranking candidate who was not given a promotion.

"I think the decision speaks for itself," Emmet said.

The town has until Sept. 24 to file an appeal of the decision. Should the town do so, the verdict also ordered that an injunction blocking a planned reorganization of the department's upper ranks and the hiring of new captains and deputy chiefs should remain in force.

In January as Honulik's trial neared, the town announced a plan to reorganize the police department which would have promoted Ridberg and Pacewicz to deputy chief, complicating Honulik's case should Shay decide that the captain job was rightfully Honulik's.

Shay blocked the promotions, but later both sides in the case agreed to let Ridberg be appointed deputy chief.

Shortly after the plan was announced, the Board of Selectmen voted to recategorize the deputy chief position, Shay noted, which would allow them to appoint a candidate who was not the top ranked on an eligibility list.

"The reorganization of the upper ranks of the Greenwich Police Department and the amendments of the qualifications for the position of Deputy chief while ostensibly instituted as part of a succession plan for the department were in fact, part of a pattern to advance the career of Pacewicz and to hinder the advancement of Honulik," Shay wrote.

Fox countered that the town has been reorganizing and declassifying positions throughout town departments over several years, and that it was not timed to interfere with Honulik's case.

Shay also awarded Honulik more than $75,000 in back pay and interest, as well as legal fees, which Emmett said could total more than $250,000.

Fox estimated the town has spent more than $200,000 in legal fees on the case.

Sgt. James Bonney, the president of the Greenwich Silver Shield Association, the police union, said that he believed the verdict has validated many of the complaints the union has made about Lash and the former chief in recent years.

"I'm very happy for Gary but I feel bad for Mike Pacewicz because he is a nice guy," Bonney said. "Personalities aside, I think to have a third party, a state Superior Court judge, to rule against the town and criticize their arrogance shows how decisions have adversely effected this town and department."

Copyright © 2007, Southern Connecticut Newspapers, Inc.